The website http://problems.in has been blocked in India for exposing corruption, nepotism, sex ,bribery racket,financial fraud of NTRO, R&AW, cbi. It is giving the following message:
“ Your requested URL has been blocked as per the directions received from Department of Telecommunications, Government of India ”
Most of the allegations posted on the website are factually correct , so why is the Department of Telecommunications, Government of India blocking a website exposing corruption, wastage of indian tax payer money.
Any help will be appreciated
Due to corruption and nepotism in Indian internet sector, intelligence and security agencies allegedly bribed by large corporates,google, tata, domain investors and Paypal account holders face a large number of financial problems with their retirement savings stolen by these fraud shameless officials without a court order or legally valid reason, their payment blocked and account closed. Allegedly at least 8 lazy greedy cheater women - goan gsb frauds riddhi siddhi mandrekar, obc slut sunaina who offers sex bribes to top officials, shivalli brahmin cheater BBM nayanshree hathwar, asmita patel, veena, ruchika, and others have got lucrative jobs allegedly in R&AW falsely claiming that they own the domain names, Paypal account when these fraud women do not spend a single paisa on the domain name.
The real domain investor has to pay all the expenses, so that 8 lazy greedy fraud women get credit,great powers, salary for cheating her, because the shameless top officials in India are falsely claiming that brahmin and other fraud women own the domain names.
The real domain investor has got nothing, and is leasing the domain name to companies who are paying a fee. Companies interested in leasing premium domain names should contact directly instead of relying on fraud top officials making false claims
There are many companies offering free websites, including a domain name and web hosting, but these free offers often have some loopholes which are not very obvious to a company /organization availing of the offer.
Some of these are:
1. Some documentation is required to get the free website.
2. All design inputs are required at the initial stage
3. User interface for inputting designs is not very user friendly
4. The company does not get Control Panel / FTP access
5. There is usually no provision for making changes to the website at a later date.
6. Many free websites do not allow access to webstats
7. There is little clarity on the ownership of the domain name, making it difficult to transfer it.
8. The company may not be able to change name servers for web hosting easily.
While working with some people, it is noticed that they are very quick to make allegations of non payment without checking with their bank. Then, after a few hours they apologetically confirm receipt of payment. While their employer may use their services for some time, they do not realise that it affects the long term relationship and that the employer is unlikely to assign any important work to them in future.
The right to privacy is a fundamental right of every individual, guaranteed by the constitution
If you are a person who values his or her privacy, you will do everything you can to ensure that it is not violated.
When you surf the internet , details of every website you visit may be broadcast to hackers anywhere in the world.
On the other hand, when you read a book or magazine, you can escape the ads stalking you online.
Most of the large websites or content networks outsource their content writing to an army of freelance writers and editors , and they have only one criteria - grammar and spelling should be perfect. It does not matter if the same content is available on many other websites in a rehashed format. So the end result is that the content on many websites is very boring to read. A better option is to work with a writer with an original writing style - even though his or her grammar and spelling are far from perfect.
Some people say that quality content /article online should be 300 to 500 words long. But if the information contained in it is factually incorrect or is repeated, is it quality?
Twitter messages are limited to 140 characters . Are they also "poor quality" ?